Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Heaven is for Real 2014: A Review

By Gene Ogorodov

When I watched the movie Heaven is for Real my expectations were low. The overtly predatory nature of American religion, especially Evangelical Protestantism, suggested that this film existed for the sole purpose of manipulation and extortion. Yet, even with already jaded perspective Heaven is for Real stooped below my lowest expectations.

Silly, sappy, and dishonest are adjectives which come far to readily to mind when describing this film. The genre of Evangelical testimonial which forms the basic structure of the plot discredits the validity of the story out of hand. Cherry picking past events to construct a plausible support for supernatural intervention is the complete opposite of an unbiased and objective history. Also, using the biased overly spiritualized formulations of the average Testimony a less than creative writer could make Joseph Stalin appear to be one of the most pious Evangelicals of the Twentieth Century. What could possibly be a more radial spiritual transformation than going from a gangster to founding a State Church?

However, to pass Heaven is for Real off as an insipid piece of rubbish belies reality. The subject is unworthy of a rational audience, but beyond that this movie exemplifies the skill and artistry of a major Hollywood production. The cinematography, the script, and the acting were exceptional, and likewise the message appealed to more than a lunatic fringe that enjoys brand new miraculous revelations.

Like the most clever Nazi propaganda it presented a caricature of the most cogent objections to the child's vision of Heaven and ground them to pieces under the weight of apparently overwhelming popular acceptance and the transient pleasure of happy delusions. The subtext of the entire movie is something along these lines-- No matter what anyone else says they really believe; furthermore, you know you want to believe, so, go ahead, believe.

But why does the movie want us, the audience, to believe? Does it want to expand the aforementioned lunatic fringe? Not likely. They make lots money for charlatans like Todd Burpo (the author of the book and inspiration for the movie), but preparing victims for that kind of vampirism is hardly worthy of a major work of the American propaganda machine which is used to extracting fortunes far larger than any two-bit religious con-artists could ever imagine.

The real vampirism of this film is to suck the validity out of the natural human emotion grief. Grief and anger make people uncontrollable, but popular control is the business of Hollywood thus the power of grief must be destroyed. Heaven is for Real takes the sting out of death, ultimately, by presenting the dead as a group to be envied. However, it is human to mourn the dead and to hate the vicissitudes of this world that throw away life for no purpose, and, conversely, it is unnatural to live a life that envies the dead. At first glance this world view give absolute courage, but it carries with it a nihilism that invalidates human experience and, in the end, negates personal responsibility.

The most despicable example of this is shown in the discrediting of mother's grief over a dead son who had died in the Global War on Terror. Why should she be sad? Her son is in heaven. There is no more pain or suffering, just eternal pleasure. Wouldn't it be more reasonable for her to be happy for him since he has attained eternal bliss?

After a more than a decade of constant war with no end in sight and a world that is more in fear of terrorist attacks than ever before, the stated purpose for the Global War on Terror ring hollow. In World War II families of dead service men and women had the comfort of knowing that their loved ones died in a necessary cause. Likewise the incompatibility the Eastern and Western Blocs gave meaning to the families of the dead. But in the current wars have no meaning, and thus it is hard to come to any reasonable conclusion other than their dead died in vain. But this movie gives meaning to their deaths in presenting a death as the ultimate achievement of life.

Hollywood has lowered the bar on its already reptilian themes. No longer is it just the fault of the poor that they were born into a society that disenfranchised them. It is not enough that we live in a meritocracy where the greatest merit is having good luck. Greed is not just good; it is a moral imperative, and now the lives of those who are abused and murdered by our criminal society have no meaning in this life. The only life that has meaning for most people is the afterlife. In short the poor are human cattle, and they should be thankful that the masters of mankind for leading them to the slaughterhouse.

Sorry Todd Burpo and TriStar Pictures I think your world view is a load of crap. I may be strange, but I prefer religion that explains the world I live in and answers the paradoxes that I live with day to day; rather than a type that overlays an implausible and delusional fantasies on top of untreated miseries. It is somewhat incredulous when people claim that they have learned in a moment more about the meaning of life than 200,000 of human existence has failed to reveal. Socrates had the humility to accept that some of the most fundamental mysteries in life cannot be answered. I don't believe that a four year old child was wiser than Socrates.